Is protected PCI truly protective? Critical reflections following CHIPBCIS3 and previous evidence

Fernando Quevedo-Candela; Tomás Cieza

doi:10.47487/apcyccv.v7i2.633

Autores/as

Fernando Quevedo-Candela Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada; Université Laval, Quebec, Canada. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5700-4372
Tomás Cieza Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada; Université Laval, Quebec, Canada. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8547-3004

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47487/apcyccv.v7i2.633

Palabras clave:

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Heart-Assist Devices, Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Revascularization, Ventricular Function, Left

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Perera D, Ryan M, Ezad SM, Khan SQ, Webb I, O’Kane PD, et al. CHIP‑BCIS3 Investigators. Left Ventricular Unloading in High‑Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(18):1779-1789. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2515704.

O’Neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J, Henriques JP, Dixon S, Massaro J, et al. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intraaortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation. 2012;126(14):1717-27. doi: 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098194.

Perera D, Stables R, Thomas M, Booth J, Pitt M, Blackman D, et al. Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304(8):867-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1190

Di Pietro G, Improta R, De Filippo O, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes in patients following protected high-risk PCI. Am J Cardiol. 2016;258:172–179.

Vetrovec GW, Kaki A, Dahle TG. A review of bleeding risk with Impella-supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Int. 2020;14:92–99.

Asleh R, Resar J. Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1209. doi:10.3390/ jcm8081209

Stretch R, Sauer CM, Yuh DD, Bonde P. National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1407–1415. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.958

Dhruva SS, Ross JS, Mortazavi BJ, et al. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. JAMA. 2020;323:734–745. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.0254

Lombardi M, Chiabrando J, Ameri P, et al. Left ventricular functional recovery after complex high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention supported with microaxial flow pump. J Cardiovasc Med. 2025;26:575–581. doi:10.2459/JCM.00001786

Azzalini L, Seth M, Sukul D, Arora DS, Chattahi J, Osman A, et al. Impact of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2022;185:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.09.007.

Maznyczka AM, McCartney PJ, Oldroyd KG, Lindsay M, McEntegart M, Eteiba H, et al. Risk Stratification Guided by the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(2):e009529. doi: 10.1161/ CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009529.

Leick J, Gjata A, Pulz J, Weisbarth T, Richter K, Krause T, et al. Evaluation of LVEDP Change During High-Risk PCI With and Without Impella Support (ELVIS)—A Pilot Trial. J Clin Med. 2025;14(3):824. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030824.

Shah R, Nayyar M, Le F, et al. A meta-analysis of optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis. 2021;33:91–97. doi:10.1097/MCA.0000000000001041

Soriano-Moreno D, Fernández-Guzmán D, Tuco K, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy for stable coronary artery disease: An umbrella review. Heliyon. 2024;10:e27210. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27210

Amin AP, Spertus JA, Curtis JP, et al. The Evolving Landscape of Impella Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Mechanical Circulatory Support. Circulation. 2020;141:273– 284. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043606

Kayali F, Tahhan O, Vecchio G, Jubouri M, Noubani JM, Bailey DM, et al. Left ventricular unloading to facilitate ventricular remodelling in heart failure: A narrative review of mechanical circulatory support. Exp Physiol. 2024;109(11):1826-1836. doi: 10.1113/EP091796