Experiencia de 5 años en soporte circulatorio mecánico de corta duración en pacientes posinfarto de miocardio: un reporte del registro INCORMACS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47487/apcyccv.v1i3.76Palabras clave:
Infarto agudo de miocardio, choque cardiogénico, dispositivos de soporte circulatorio mecánico, Oxigenación con membrana extracorpóreaResumen
Objetivo. Determinar las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de los pacientes con dispositivos de soporte mecánico circulatorio (DSMC) de corta duración, posinfarto de miocardio (IAM) en un hospital de referencia nacional.
Materiales y métodos. Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, de pacientes post IAM en los que se implantó dispositivos de soporte mecánico circulatorio de corta duración desde el año 2015 al 2020.
Resultados. Se implantaron nueve dispositivos de asistencia en igual número de pacientes debido a choque cardiogénico post-IAM. Todos los pacientes fueron varones con IAM con elevación del segmento ST (IAMCEST). Se implantaron ocho dispositivos de oxigenación por membrana extracorpórea (ECMO) y una bomba de flujo centrífugo (en configuración LVAD). La mediana de tiempo de uso del dispositivo fue de ocho días. Las complicaciones más frecuentes fueron la hemorragia no fatal (55,6%), injuria renal aguda (44,4%) y la sepsis (44,4%). La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue de 55,6%.
Conclusiones. El uso de DSMC de corta duración posinfarto de miocardio es aún limitado en nuestra institución y tiene como principal representante al ECMO post-IAMCEST complicado con choque cardiogénico. A pesar del uso de estos dispositivos la mortalidad intrahospitalaria es elevada.
Descargas
Referencias
Reynolds HR, Hochman JS. Cardiogenic shock: Current concepts and improving outcomes. Circulation. 2008;117:686-97
Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, et al. Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital deathrates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective. Circulation. 2009;119:1211-9.
Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 625-34.
Kunadian V, Qiu W, Ludman P, et al. Outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock following percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era: An analysis from the BCIS database (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society). JACC Cardiovasc Interven 2014;7:1374-85.
Nagpal AD, Singal RK, Arora RC, et al. Temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiac critical care: a state-of-the-art review and algorithm for device selection. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:110-18.
Ouweneel DM, Eriksen E, Sjauw KD, et al. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support versus intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69: 278-87.
Takayama H, Truby L, Koekort M, et al. Clinical outcome of mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock in the current era. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013; 32: 106-11.
Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1287-96.
Harjola VP, Lassus J, Sionis A, et al. Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail 2015; 17: 501-09.
Berg DD, Bohula EA, van Diepen S, et al. Epidemiology of shock in contemporary cardiac intensive care units. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2019; 12: e005618.
Shah M, Patnaik S, Patel B, Ram P, et al. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States Clin Res Cardiol. 2017. DOI 10.1007/s00392-017-1182-2.
Vallabhajosyula, et al. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014 Circ Heart Fail. 2019;12:e005929. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.005929
Vallabhajosyula S, Bell M, Sandhu G, et al. Complications in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Supported with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 839; doi:10.3390/jcm9030839
Rao, P, Khalpey, Z, Smith, R, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. Circ Heart Fail. 2018;11:e004905.doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.004905.
Giordanino E, Absi D, Favaloro L, et al. Short-term mechanical circulatory support devices as bridge to heart transplantation: A prospective single-center experience in Argentina 2020. Clinical Transplantation. 2020;34:e13888. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13888
Matteucci M, Fina D, Jiritano F, et al. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the setting of postinfarction mechanical complications: outcome analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2020; doi:10.1093/icvts/ivaa108.
Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1584–88.
Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 119–77.
Acharya D, Torabi M, Borgstrom M, et al. Clinical Characteristics And Outcomes Of Patients With Myocardial Infarction And Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Extracorporeal Life Support. JACC March 24, 2020 Volume 75, Issue 11
Lorusso R, Gelsomino S, Parise O, et al. Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock in Elderly Patients: Trends in Application and Outcome From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017; 104(1):62-69. Doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.023
Ki Hong Choi, Jeong Hoon Yang, Daivd Hong, et al. The Optimal Timing of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with Refractory Cardiogenic Shock. Journal of The American College of Cardiology, 74(13), Suppl B, 2019.
